Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Power

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the property was used “for storage” and “serviced by a regular flow of heavy trucks”
• holding sales law concepts not to be relevant to zoning
• holding sales law concepts not to be relevant to zoning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).