Skip to main content
· 1/11/1966

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Holmes

Citations

  • 2 Mich. App. 190
  • 139 N.W.2d 131
  • 1966 Mich. App. LEXIS 734

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Both the General Assembly and the Bureau of Code Revision were adamant * * * that there be no new substantive law permitted in the Revised Code at its adoption” in 1953 [emphasis sic]
  • “Both the General Assembly and the Bureau of Code Revision were adamant * * * that there be no new substantive law permitted in the Revised Code at its adoption ” in 1953 [emphasis sic]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, Gillis, Watts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.