· 1/11/1966
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Holmes
Citations
- 2 Mich. App. 190
- 139 N.W.2d 131
- 1966 Mich. App. LEXIS 734
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Both the General Assembly and the Bureau of Code Revision were adamant * * * that there be no new substantive law permitted in the Revised Code at its adoption” in 1953 [emphasis sic]
- “Both the General Assembly and the Bureau of Code Revision were adamant * * * that there be no new substantive law permitted in the Revised Code at its adoption ” in 1953 [emphasis sic]
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burns, Gillis, Watts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.