Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Charles W. Sears Real Estate, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying petition to 15 proceed IFP because petitioner and his wife had a combined annual income of between $34,000 16 and $37,000
• denying petition to proceed IFP because petitioner and his 14 wife had a combined annual income of between $34,000 and $37,000
• denying petition to proceed IFP because petitioner and his 14 wife had a combined annual income of between $34,000 and $37,000
• denying petition to 6 proceed IFP because petitioner and his wife had a combined annual income of between $34,000 7 and $37,000
• denying petition to 18 proceed IFP because petitioner and his wife had a combined annual income of between $34,000 19 and $37,000

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).