California Court of Appeal· 2/29/1956
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Blade
Citations
- 139 Cal. App. 2d 580
- 294 P.2d 140
- 1956 Cal. App. LEXIS 2145
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- fraudulent concealment tolls the statute of limitations until plaintiff discovers, or should have discovered, the facts upon which its cause of action is based
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fox
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal· 1964-06-10· cited 177×
- UA Local 343 of the United Ass'n v. Nor-Cal Plumbing, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1994-10-14· cited 139×
- William Waggoner v. Robert Lee DallaireNinth Circuit· 1981-07-10· cited 93×
- Sanders v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1970-10-14· cited 60×
- Stevens v. MarcoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1956-12-31· cited 54×
- Pry Corp. of America v. LeachCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1960-02-04· cited 45×
- Britz, Inc. v. Alfa-Laval Food & Dairy Co.California Court of Appeal· 1995-05-08· cited 43×
- Marshall v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1965-02-15· cited 30×
- Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1987-05-08· cited 28×
- Moriarty v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1960-08-22· cited 23×
- Store of Happiness v. Carmona & Allen, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1957-07-03· cited 21×
- Lint v. ChisholmCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1981-06-17· cited 21×
- Hernandez v. GarcettiCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-12-14· cited 19×
- Ansco Construction Co. v. Ocean View Estates, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1959-03-30· cited 18×
- Worthington Corp. v. El Chicote Ranch Properties, Ltd.California Court of Appeal· 1967-10-23· cited 15×
- Tibbets v. RobbCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1958-03-12· cited 14×
- County of Santa Cruz v. McLeodCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1961-02-20· cited 13×
- Agair Inc. v. ShaefferCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1965-02-25· cited 10×
- Rodes v. ShannonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1963-12-02· cited 8×
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Las Lomitas School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1961-04-21· cited 6×
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court· 1945-05-29· cited 327×
- Dillard v. McKnightCalifornia Supreme Court· 1949-08-25· cited 162×
- Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court· 1944-11-21· cited 139×
- Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1951-01-26· cited 137×
- Showalter v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court· 1940-11-04· cited 137×
- Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1934-10-01· cited 137×
- Haigler v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1941-10-01· cited 81×
- Steiner v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1950-08-11· cited 79×
- McCall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1934-10-01· cited 76×
- Watson v. PooreCalifornia Supreme Court· 1941-07-28· cited 53×
- Lee v. HensleyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1951-04-23· cited 47×
- Minor v. BaldridgeCalifornia Supreme Court· 1898-12-29· cited 46×
- Gregory v. SpiekerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-11-23· cited 40×
- L. B. Laboratories, Inc. v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court· 1952-05-23· cited 37×
- Peterson v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1946-04-30· cited 34×
- Katz v. EnosCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1945-03-02· cited 31×
- Broadway Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1955-06-03· cited 28×
- Schwarting v. ArtelCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1940-08-19· cited 21×
- Weaver v. GrunbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1939-02-15· cited 20×
- Acme Paper Co. v. GoffsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1954-05-14· cited 19×
Other cases named Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Blade
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.