Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Charles W. Sears Real Estate, Inc., Dba Sears Real Estate and Charles W. Sears, Appeal of Charles W. Sears

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying petition to 15 proceed IFP because petitioner and his wife had a combined annual income of between $34,000 16 and $37,000
• denying petition to 18 proceed IFP because petitioner and his wife had a combined annual income of between $34,000 19 and $37,000
• denying petition to proceed IFP because petitioner and his 14 wife had a combined annual income of between $34,000 and $37,000
• denying petition to 16 proceed IFP because petitioner and his wife had a combined annual income of between $34,000 17 and $37,000
• finding district court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel where plaintiff was not indigent for purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis
• finding district court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel where plaintiff was not indigent for purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).