Skip to main content
· 10/15/2002

Searle v. Wyndham International, Inc.

Citations

  • 126 Cal. Rptr. 2d 231
  • 102 Cal. App. 4th 1327
  • 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10572
  • 2002 Daily Journal DAR 12169
  • 2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4834

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he ‘unfairness’ prong of [the 6 UCL] does not give the courts a general license to review the fairness of contracts.”
  • “In sum, in failing to advice its guests as to how it compensates its employees, the hotel is not guilty of any deceit.”
  • not unfair for hotel to assess a mandatory service charge on guests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.