Seariver Maritime Financial Holdings, Inc. v. Pena

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that venue was improper in Texas because the challenged statute only regulated activities in Alaska
• holding that venue was improper in Texas because the challenged statute only regulated activities in Alaska
• holding that venue was improper in Texas because the challenged statute only regulated activities in Alaska
• holding that venue was improper in Texas but proper in Alaska because the challenged statute only regulated activities in Alaska
• rejecting venue based on claimed possibility of future injury in the district
• “A court is not obliged to determine the ‘best’ venue for a cause of action pending before it, but rather must determine only whether or not its venue is proper.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).