Searcy v. Shoney's Restaurant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the burden of proof was on the wife as she asserted that the husband’s nonmarital accounting practice enhanced in value during the marriage
• finding that the party asserting entitlement to the enhancement in value of a nonmarital asset has the burden of proof
• reversing award in nonmarital asset because party failed to prove an increase in value of the asset

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).