Skip to main content
· 5/9/1904

Searcy & Pfaff, Ltd. v. Leveque

Citations

  • 112 La. 845
  • 36 So. 752
  • 1904 La. LEXIS 472

Syllabus

<p>CONTRACT — CONSTRUCTION—EVIDENCE.</p> <p>1. Plaintiffs entered into an agreement by which they were to furnish the material and do the printing for a periodical, and look exclusively to the earnings of the periodical for payment, and in no event to hold the publisher individually liable for the expenses of the publication. After the publication had been going on for some time, and the expenses over and above the earnings had reached a considerable sum, plaintiffs refused to go on any further unless paid cash for the future issues of the paper. The publisher, who was without means to satisfy the demand, transferred the printing of the periodical to other parties, and plaintiffs brought the present suit to hold him personally liable for the debt of the paper. Held, the contract of the parties is the law of the ease, and plaintiffs cannot recover.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because the parties adopted a forum selection clause, only under extraordinary circumstances unrelated to the convenience of the parties should [a] §1404(a) motion be denied.”
  • “Because the parties adopted a forum selection clause, only under extraordinary circumstances unrelated to the convenience of the parties should [a] §1404(a) motion be denied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Provosty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.