Skip to main content

Search v. Search

Citations

  • 2026 Ohio 1304

Syllabus

Appellant-father's argument that the trial court erred in overruling his objections to the magistrate's decision regarding his parenting time is moot because his daughter turned 18. Following her emancipation, there is no relief regarding parenting time that this court can provide. The dismissal without prejudice of appellant's motion regarding medical expenses preserved his right to refile his claim for the expenses, so it was not a final, appealable over which this court has jurisdiction. To the extent appellant's remaining assigned errors relate to parenting time, they are moot, and to the extent they relate to any medical expenses, they are beyond this court's jurisdiction. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Huffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.