Search v. Search
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 1304
Syllabus
Appellant-father's argument that the trial court erred in overruling his objections to the magistrate's decision regarding his parenting time is moot because his daughter turned 18. Following her emancipation, there is no relief regarding parenting time that this court can provide. The dismissal without prejudice of appellant's motion regarding medical expenses preserved his right to refile his claim for the expenses, so it was not a final, appealable over which this court has jurisdiction. To the extent appellant's remaining assigned errors relate to parenting time, they are moot, and to the extent they relate to any medical expenses, they are beyond this court's jurisdiction. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Huffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Robinette v. BryantOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-09· cited 20×
- State ex rel. DeDonno v. MasonOhio Supreme Court· 2011-03-31· cited 12×
- Vaught v. PollackOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-14· cited 6×
- Sullivan v. SullivanOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-23· cited 5×
- In re S.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-10-14· cited 3×
- Rajkumari v. DamkeOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-02-09· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.