Seaquist v. Dayton
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 4563
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in affirming the decision of the City of Dayton Civil Service Board upholding appellant's termination for disciplinary reasons. There were clear instances of violations of the City's mask policy, insubordination when appellant actively ignored and refused to comply with the City's mask policy following direct orders, conduct unbecoming an employee, and absence without leave. Judgment affirmed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that Congress amended the statute in 1925 “so as to add motor vehicles and their transfer and storage facilities to the interstate transportation facilities enumerated from which the proscribed thefts or takings must occur.”
- “[T]he evidence clearly showed that Padilla took physical possession of the slacks, exercised dominion over them to the exclusion of the owner. .. . ”
- theft from interstate commerce under 18 U.S.C. § 659
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Huffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.