Seaport Capital Partners, LLC v. Speer

Citations

• 202 Conn. App. 487

Syllabus

The plaintiff in error, who had been appointed the receiver of rents in certain foreclosure actions, filed a writ of error, claiming that the court improperly granted a motion for a protective order filed by the defendant in error, S Co., to preclude certain of his discovery requests and held him liable to pay a certain sum to S Co. The plaintiff in error filed the writ of error in the Supreme Court, which transferred it to this court. Held that because the plaintiff in error failed to brief his claims adequately and to comport his brief and appendix with the appellate rules of prac- tice, this court declined to review his claims and dismissed the writ of error; any meaningful comprehension or review of the plaintiff in error's claims was made virtually impossible because of the significant deficien- cies in his appellate brief and sprawling appendix, which was not appro- priately limited in accordance with the rules of practice and appeared to contain materials that were not part of the proceedings at issue. Argued January 7—officially released February 2, 2021