SEAPC v. Cammack II Orchards

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• EIS need not cover subsequent phases if initial project is substantially independent of subsequent phase and project would be constructed without regard to future development
• EIS need not consider impacts of subsequent phases when initial phase is substantially independent and would be constructed without regard to future developments
• EIS need not cover subsequent phases if initial project is sub stantially independent of subsequent phase and project would be constructed without regard to future development
• property values exempt from consideration of adverse impacts on built environment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).