Sean v. 172 Aububon Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court ruled that where only a notice of intention had been filed, no action had been instituted
• “It is urged by claimant that pursuant to CPLR 2103, service of the claim [under Court of Claims Act § 10] was complete on the date it was mailed and, therefore, it was timely served. CPLR 2103 (subd [b]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).