Sean T. Haddon v. Gary J. Walters, Chief Usher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a district court’s jurisdiction is satisfied where the plaintiff’s “claim arises under the laws of the United States”
• determining that the “Executive residence” is not an “independent establishment” by considering Congress’s separate use of both terms in the U.S. Code
• “That Congress distinguished the Executive Residence from the independent establishments, whatever they may be, suggests that Congress does not regard the Executive Residence to be an independent establishment, as it uses that term.”
• staff of the Execu­ tive Residence are not employees within an Executive agency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).