Sean Lebo v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding “that the electronic communications proscribed by subsection (a)(7) do not implicate protected speech under the First Amendment” and that defendant “failed to establish that section 42.07(a)(7) violates the constitution by being overbroad or unduly vague”
• “We consider the free-speech analysis in Scott equally applicable to section 42.07(a)(7)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).