Skip to main content
· 7/24/2018

Sean Flemon v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that telecommunications company's agents had authority to appoint subagents for purposes of TCPA violations
  • rejecting due process challenge to $10,000 maximum penalty per violation un- der the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and related state statutes
  • upholding finding of vicarious liability where the defendants’ “agents[] . . . acted within their authority to sell TV service using phone calls, [] those acts benefitted DISH,” and “DISH knew what the [agents] were doing” when the agents violated applicable law
  • “[A]cts outside of an agent’s au- thority do not generate liability for the principal.”
  • “[A]cts outside of an agent’s au- thority do not generate liability for the principal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.