Sean Anderson v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \essentially regulatory\ recordkeeping may be required of private individuals without violating the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination
• holding that records that are required by statute to be kept cannot be sheltered by the invocation of the Fifth Amendment
• holding that records that are required by statute to be kept cannot be sheltered by the invocation of the Fifth Amendment
• holding that requiring essentially regulatory records to be kept by private individuals, subject to inspection by the government, does not violate the Fifth Amendment privilege
• holding that records that are required by statute to be kept cannot be sheltered by the invocation of the Fifth Amendment
• holding that records that are required by statute to be kept cannot be sheltered by the invocation of the Fifth Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).