Seaman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the argument was not preserved for this court’s review because “[w]e can find no specific objection by defendant to the use of corroborating evidence as a factor in finding the child hearsay statements to be reliable”
• concluding that the argument was not preserved for this court’s review because “[w]e can find no specific objection by defendant to the use of corroborating evidence as a factor in finding the child hearsay statements to be reliable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gray Mart, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Ins.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-17· cited 17×
• Reynolds v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-09-20· cited 12×
• Corona v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-28· cited 5×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-09-28· cited 2×
• Roberts v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-05-16
• Durham v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-02

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Idaho v. Wright
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,081×
• Maryland v. Craig
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,040×
• Smith v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-04-02· cited 169×
• Perez v. Singletary
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-10-19· cited 1×