Seago v. O'Malley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a court’s de novo review of a denial of a firearms license “may be confined to the administrative record or may be supplemented by the admission of additional evidence”
• stating that, under § 923(f)(3), “the trial court need not accord any particular weight” to an agency’s findings and decision unless, in its discretion, it chooses to
• finding dealer’s violations of GCA were willful because, “where ... the licensee is a corporation, it is chargeable with the conduct and knowledge of its employees.”
• \Consideration of judicial economy suggests that trial anew of factual matters already litigated should be avoided unless substantial doubt infects the agency's findings of fact.\
• pawnshop employees were \instructed on the requirements of the law” but \despite repeated warnings ... violations continued to occur”
• “The record shows that the plaintiff’s agents were instructed on the requirements of the law and acknowledged an understanding of the Secretary’s regulations. Nevertheless, and despite repeated warnings from the Secretary, violations continued to occur” (footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).