Seagle v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence of appellant’s participation in subsequent robbery relevant to issue of whether she was an innocent witness to crime charged rather than a full participant
• “ ‘If the accused is charged with a crime that requires a prerequisite intent, then prior or subsequent criminal acts are admissible to show that he had the necessary intent when he committed the now charged crime[.]’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).