Skip to main content
· 6/20/1986

Seafirst Corp. v. Jenkins

Citations

  • 644 F. Supp. 1152
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23985
  • 5 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 46

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that business judgment rule was not satisfied under Washington law by proof of good faith alone because statutory standard of care governed determination whether officers and directors exercised due care in fulfillment of their responsibilities
  • board members’ declarations as to what actions they would have taken if auditors had notified them of inadequacies were sufficient admissible causation evidence
  • board members' declarations as to what actions they would have taken if auditors had notified them of inadequacies were sufficient admissible causation evidence
  • applying and interpreting Washington law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rothstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.