· 6/20/1986
Seafirst Corp. v. Jenkins
Citations
- 644 F. Supp. 1152
- 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23985
- 5 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 46
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that business judgment rule was not satisfied under Washington law by proof of good faith alone because statutory standard of care governed determination whether officers and directors exercised due care in fulfillment of their responsibilities
- board members’ declarations as to what actions they would have taken if auditors had notified them of inadequacies were sufficient admissible causation evidence
- board members' declarations as to what actions they would have taken if auditors had notified them of inadequacies were sufficient admissible causation evidence
- applying and interpreting Washington law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rothstein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.