Seabreeze Restaurant, Inc. v. Paumgardhen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred where it “failed to consider these general contract principles and ignored the fact that all of the documents were executed together, as part of one transaction”
• “When provisions in a contract appear to be in conflict, they should be construed so as to be reconciled, if possible.”
• “ ‘An interpretation of a contract which gives a reasonable, lawful and effective meaning to all of the terms is preferred to an interpretation which leaves a part unreasonable, unlawful or of no effect’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).