Seaborn v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that a party presenting evidence of “strict no trespassing rules” was unhelpful in determining whether an access road was a highway because “no evidence was presented . . . that it had adopted such a no trespassing policy with respect to the use of its access road”
• “The presumption created in Kay Management has no application in parking lot cases.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).