Sea v. Larimore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting summary judgment in favor of defendants on plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C. §1983 claims where plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies under the PLRA
• finding plaintiff’s allegations that IGP refused to process grievances did not raise issue of fact where record showed that plaintiff “appealed and exhausted approximately 20 grievances during his 29 years of incarceration”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).