Skip to main content
· 5/27/1986

Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Sea-Land of Puerto Rico, Inc.

Citations

  • 636 F. Supp. 750
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25069

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court granting plaintiff’s motion to compel arbitration noted “[t]his is not ... situation where ... party initiates judicial proceedings without mentioning or referring to arbitration”
  • “Given our ruling that all issues raised in this action are arbitrable, retaining jurisdiction and staying the action will serve no purpose.”
  • “Given our ruling that all issues raised in this action are arbitrable, retaining jurisdiction and staying the action will serve no purpose.”
  • “Given our ruling that all issues raised in this action are arbitrable, retaining jurisdiction and staying the action will serve no purpose.”
  • “Given our ruling that all issues raised in this action are arbitrable, retaining jurisdiction and staying the action will serve no purpose.”
  • party may not avoid arbitration by splitting its action as one based on contract and one based on tort and then claim arbitration was not applicable to the tort portion of the claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cerezo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.