Sea Land Industries, Inc. v. General Ship Repair Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• inferring from the compensation arrangements that the parties must have contemplated that the supplier would assume the responsibility for liability insurance, and considering this as an indication that the parties intended the supplier to bear the risk of loss
• GSR’s red letter clause did not limit its liability for its employee’s failure to secure a land-based crane because clause by its terms only covered ship repair work and the clause “must be strictly construed against” the drafter, GSR

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).