Skip to main content
· 7/20/2007

SD Protection, Inc. v. Del Rio

Citations

  • 498 F. Supp. 2d 576
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52801
  • 2007 WL 2115269

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that discovery is necessary before the court can determine whether the alleged trade secrets are protect-able
  • denying motion to dismiss and noting that without discovery, it would be “premature” to determine whether a restrictive covenant was reasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nicholas G. Garaufis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.