Skip to main content
· 10/25/1954

Scurlock v. Yarbrough

Citations

  • 224 Ark. 113
  • 271 S.W.2d 916
  • 1954 Ark. LEXIS 535

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he trial court could not have directed a verdict of acquittal because there is no verdict in a bench trial. Therefore, even if a motion for a directed verdict was made, such a motion has no meaning when a case is tried without a jury.”
  • “the trial court could not have directed a verdict . . . because there is no verdict in a bench trial. . . . [E]ven if a motion for directed verdict was made, such a motion has no meaning when a case is tried without a jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFaddin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.