Scurlock v. Central Distributors, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• one does not have standing to assert that another’s right to due process has been violated
• “Even assuming that in its final order the juvenile court took notice of some facts not entered in evidence, . . . the juvenile court’s conclusion . . . was amply supported by other evidence that was properly admitted.” (footnote omitted)
• parties raised no objection to introduction of prior termination orders
• parties raised no objection to introduction of prior termination orders

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).