Skip to main content
· 5/30/2024

SCS Carbon Transport v. Waloch (cons. w/20230149, 162-174 & 20230176)

Citations

  • 2024 ND 109

Syllabus

Judgment confirming right of entry for pre-condemnation examination and survey was not equivalent to a perpetual easement, because the authorized purposes all had a definite end point. To establish a violation under either takings provision, challengers must demonstrate they have a property interest that is constitutionally protected. Statute permitting pre-condemnation entry for survey and examination illustrates a longstanding background principle of state property law and reflects the original public meaning of state constitution's takings provision. The entry statute limits the entry to the authorized purpose or mission of determining the location and necessary scope of private property taken to serve the greatest public benefit at the lowest cost in terms of private injury.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]f, in the original complaint, the correct party was properly sued but incorrectly named—then the amendment relates back.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tufte, Jerod E.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.