Scruggins v. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]t is clear that the [Walsh Act] ‘address[es] dangers that arise postenactment’ and thus do[es] not operate retroactively.’ ” (third and fourth alterations in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).