Scroggins v. Allstate Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that absent statutory or contractual language sanctioning a direct action, an injured third party has no direct action against an insurer for breach of duty to exercise good faith or due care
• holding that absent statutory or contractual language sanctioning a direct action, an injured third party has no direct action against an insurer for breach of duty to exercise good faith or due care
• holding that \the rule in Illinois and nearly all jurisdictions\ is that 15 absent express statutory language, an injured third party cannot pursue a direct action against an insurer for breach of duty to exercise good faith
• holding that \the rule in Illinois and nearly all jurisdictions\ is that 15 absent express statutory language, an injured third party cannot pursue a direct action against an insurer for breach of duty to exercise good faith
• holding that \the rule in Illinois and nearly all jurisdictions\ is that 15 absent express statutory language, an injured third party cannot pursue a direct action against an insurer for breach of duty to exercise good faith
• insurer's duty of good faith and fair dealing is owed to insured, not to third parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).