Skip to main content
· 2/22/1994

Scrofani v. Fred-Rick Holding Corp.

Citations

  • 201 A.D.2d 639
  • 608 N.Y.S.2d 247
  • 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1480

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “For the purposes of this appeal, the parties agree that the CLRA's standing requirements are effectively identical to those of the UCL and FAL, and that we may thus analyze the question of standing under each statute concurrently.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.