Skip to main content
· 10/25/2004

Scritchfield v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance

Citations

  • 341 F. Supp. 2d 675
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21371
  • 2004 WL 2378803

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing a claim for declaratory relief because “[p]laintiffs would get nothing from a declaratory judg[]ment that they would not get from prevailing on their breach of contract claims.”
  • noting, in dismissing the claim for declaratory judgment, that “[t]here [wa]s no claim that there [wa]s a need to interpret the contract language because of possible future events”
  • “Plaintiffs would get nothing from a declaratory judg[]|ment that they would not get from prevailing on their breach of contract claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.