Skip to main content
· 7/1/1858

Scriber v. Masten

Citations

  • 11 Cal. 303

Syllabus

<p>Where the defendant contracted with a factor who was in his debt for certain goods, but before he took them away was informed that a portion of them belonged to another, his taking such portion was an unlawful assumption of ownership, and a conversion of the property.</p> <p>A notice of the ownership of the goods which would put the defendant on inquiry is sufficient.</p> <p>In such a case, no demand is necessary previous to bringing suit.</p>

Judges: Baldwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.