Scr-Tech LLC v. Evonik Energy Servs.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \A party seeking to rely on the common interest doctrine must demonstrate that the specific communications at issue were designed to facilitate a common legal interest; a business or commercial interest will not suffice.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Friday Invs., LLC v. Bally Total Fitness of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-06-07· cited 6×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Teleglobe Communications Corp.
  Third Circuit· 2007-07-17· cited 285×
• United States v. William Aramony, United States of America v. Stephen J. Paulachak, United States of America v. Thomas J. Merlo
  Fourth Circuit· 1996-07-17· cited 257×
• Bank Brussels Lambert v. Credit Lyonnais (Suisse) S.A.
  S.D. New York· 1995-02-28· cited 116×
• Pacific Pictures Corp. v. United States District Court
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-05-10· cited 92×
• United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
  District of Columbia· 1979-04-18· cited 74×
• Mark E. Hanson, Esq. v. United States Agency for International Development
  Fourth Circuit· 2004-06-16· cited 59×
• Hunton & Williams v. United States Department of Justice
  Fourth Circuit· 2010-01-04· cited 44×
• In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena v.
  Fourth Circuit· 2005-07-18· cited 42×
• Neuberger Berman Real Estate Income Fund, Inc. v. Lola Brown Trust No. 1B
  D. Maryland· 2005-06-23· cited 38×
• Glidden Co. v. Jandernoa
  W.D. Michigan· 1997-06-05· cited 27×
• Polycast Technology Corp. v. Uniroyal, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1989-03-28· cited 24×
• Federal Election Commission v. Christian Coalition
  E.D. Virginia· 1998-01-20· cited 23×
• Bank of America, NA v. Terra Nova Ins. Co. Ltd.
  S.D. New York· 2002-07-18· cited 22×