SCR Joint Venture L.P. v. Warshawsky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a witness’s affidavit stating that he was a former vice president of the defendants’ business and was “fully familiar with the facts and circumstances set forth” therein satisfied the requirements of Rule 56
• finding that a witness’s affidavit stating that he was a former vice president of the defendants’ business and was “fully familiar with the facts and circumstances set forth” therein satisfied the requirements of former Rule 56(e)
• stating “[a]n affidavit making allegations on the basis of a party’s personal knowledge, and not merely on information and belief … may be relied upon” in summary judgment briefing
• “On or about May 23, 1998, Plaintiff Smith discovered that the curfew log was missing.”
• “On or about February 12, 1998, Defendant Baines requested the ‘running inventory list’ from Plaintiff Melendez. When Plaintiff Melendez looked in the file cabinet where the list was kept, he discovered that the documents were missing.”
• “On or 20 about May 23, 1998, Plaintiff Smith discovered that the 21 curfew log was missing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).