Scows Nos. 21 & 59

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the automatic stay did not apply to the proposed defendants where the plaintiffs alleged that the proposed defendants “are joint employers and, therefore, are jointly and severally liable to the plaintiffs for violations of the FLSA and NYLL”
• declining to consider affidavits and other outside evidence submitted by proposed defendants in opposition to the plaintiffs motion to amend
• declining to consider affidavits and other outside evidence submitted by proposed defendants in opposition to the plaintiffs motion to amend
• declining to consider affidavits and other outside evidence submitted by proposed defendants in opposition to the plaintiffs motion to amend
• declining to consider affidavits and other outside evidence submitted by proposed defendants in opposition to the plaintiff's motion to amend
• finding plaintiff plausibly alleged joint employer status where plaintiff pleaded, inter alia, that proposed defendants controlled employee compensation, retained payroll records, and monitored employee performance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).