Scottsdale Mall v. State of Indiana and Indiana State Highway Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that highway project was federal despite the fact that the State of Indiana attempted to withdraw the project from federal funding
• noting that NEPA “does not infringe on the right of a state to select a project to be financed solely out of its own funds”
• explaining that NEPA “does not infringe on the right of a state to select a project to be financed solely out of its own funds”
• all parts of the bypass were planned at the same time even though the construction of the segment at issue faced a seven to eight year delay due the environmental impact study
• NEPA applied even though state had returned federal highway funds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).