Scottsdale Insurance v. Torres

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that factual dispute as to insured employer’s workflow and injured employee’s role should be resolved at trial where such facts were dispositive of whether worker fulfilled “short-term workload conditions”
• courts “ ‘construe the words of the policy according to the fair meaning of the language used, as applied to the subject matter’ ”
• “The presence of cross: motions neither dilutes nor distorts this standard of review”
• \The presence of cross-motions neither dilutes nor distorts this standard of review\
• “[ajmbiguous policy terms are construed in favor of the insured”
• “insurer has the burden of proving that an exclusion applies”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).