Skip to main content
· 3/3/2009

Scottsdale Insurance v. Cendejas

Citations

  • 205 P.3d 1128
  • 220 Ariz. 281
  • 551 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 17
  • 2009 Ariz. App. LEXIS 26

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the defendant's unsuccessful efforts in Rosner to locate the assailants and warning that Rosner \did not hold that a party could ignore the Rule's requirements\
  • noting the defendant's unsuccessful efforts in Rosner to locate the assailants and warning that Rosner \did not hold that a party could ignore the Rule's requirements\
  • noting the defendant's unsuccessful efforts in Rosner to locate the assailants and warning that Rosner \did not hold that a party could ignore the Rule's requirements\
  • affirming Rule 68 sanctions based on expert fees paid to withdrawn expert
  • “The notice . . . merely stated that Oxley might be at fault ‘to 6 the extent that’ it performed ‘any’ work that might have caused or contributed to the fire.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weisberg, Johnsen, Orozco

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.