Skip to main content
· 4/12/2005

Scotts Company, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Central Garden & Pet Company, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee

Citations

  • 403 F.3d 781
  • 57 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 426
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 5927
  • 2005 WL 831383

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding district court did not abuse its discretion in considering motion for prejudgment interest untimely under Rule 59(e) but timely under rule 60(b)(6)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin, Gilman, Cohn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.