Skip to main content
· 4/30/1996

Scottish Heritable Trust v. Peat Marwick Main & Co.

Citations

  • 81 F.3d 606
  • 35 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 284
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 10025
  • 1996 WL 175616

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that potential investor with “no previous connection to either the corporation or the accountant” was not within such a group
  • noting \ actual knowledge of a particular plaintiff ... is not necessary if the defendant [accountant] should have had this knowledge\
  • interpreting Texas law and determining that the objective of Section 552 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts is to restrict accountants’ liability to a prescribed group and not permit recovery for all foreseeable users of an accountant’s audit report
  • \Technical noncompliance with Rule 50(b) may be excused in situations in which the purposes of the rule are satisfied.\
  • “Technical noncom- pliance with Rule 50(b) may be excused in situations in which the purposes of the rule are satisfied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wiener, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.