Skip to main content
· 12/13/1996

Scott & White Memorial Hospital v. Schexnider

Citations

  • 940 S.W.2d 594
  • 40 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 198
  • 1996 Tex. LEXIS 165

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a trial court has authority to decide a motion for sanctions while it retains plenary power, even after a nonsuit is taken
  • holding trial court retained authority to act on postjudgment motion for sanctions for prejudgment conduct during its plenary power
  • holding trial court retained authority to act on postjudgment motion for sanctions for prejudgment conduct during its plenary power
  • stating that a court cannot issue an order of sanctions after its plenary power has expired
  • permitting trial court to rule on motion for sanctions that was not pending when non-suit was filed
  • “If a litigant could purge his violation of Rule 11 merely by taking a dismissal, he would lose all incentive to ‘stop, think and investigate more carefully before serving and filing papers.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.