SCOTT WALLS v. ROADWAY, INC., etc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a defendant's right to a particular jury is integral to the guarantee against double jeopardy because it \lies at the foundation of the federal rule that jeopardy attaches when the jury is empaneled and sworn\
• recognizing that a defendant’s right to a particular jury is integral to the guarantee against double jeopardy because it “lies at the foundation of the federal rule that jeopardy attaches when the jury is empaneled and sworn”
• holding that the federal rule that jeopardy attach, in a jury trial, once the jury is empaneled and sworn in, is applicable to the States via the doctrine of incorporation
• holding that the Due Process Clause protects against prosecutorial abuse
• recognizing that a defendant’s right to a particular jury is integral to the guarantee against double jeopardy because it “lies at the foundation of the federal rule that jeopardy attaches when the jury is empaneled and sworn”
• holding that the Due Process Clause protects against prosecu-torial abuse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).