Scott v. United Fruit Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding backup tapes not to be reasonably accessible because of the high cost to restore
• “The obligation to preserve evidence arises when the party has notice that the evidence is relevant to litigation or when a party should have known that the evidence may be relevant to future litigation” (quotation marks and citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).