Scott v. Tate

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• writing that, “the underlying purpose of the malfunction theory is to afford plaintiffs the opportunity to submit their case to a jury in cases where they lack direct evidence of the defect because the product is unavailable through no fault of their own.”
• where the court quotes Dansak: “Regardless of whether the malfunction theory applies in this case, ‘the goal is the same: to prove that the product was not only defective, but that such a defect existed when it left the hands of the seller’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).