Scott v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• postconviction relief properly denied without a hearing regarding conclusory claim of failure to present witnesses where defendant failed to list witnesses not procured
• “We might agree with Scott’s argument that he had a right to testify in his own defense, but he has shown nothing to indicate the decision was other than a tactical one.”
• “We might agree with Scott’s argument that he had a right to testify in his own defense, but he has shown nothing to indicate the decision was other than a tactical one.”
• “We might agree with Scott’s argument that he had a right to testify in his own defense, but he has shown nothing to indicate the decision was other than a tactical one.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Nance v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-11-18· cited 28×
• Hickey v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2013-05-30· cited 27×
• Dansby v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-02-14· cited 21×
• Lemaster v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2013-11-07· cited 10×
• Scott v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2014-12-18· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wicks v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1980-10-20· cited 399×
• Hilliard v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1976-01-12· cited 27×
• Knappenberger v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1983-03-28· cited 20×
• Weldon v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1925-04-13· cited 19×
• House v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1959-05-18· cited 16×
• Smith v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1986-10-06· cited 11×
• Philyaw v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1987-04-20· cited 7×
• Hegwood v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1988-12-05· cited 5×
• Franks v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1986-05-27· cited 1×