District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1/22/2014
Scott v. State
Citations
- 130 So. 3d 741
- 2014 WL 228684
- 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 604
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting: “Writs of mandamus are extraordinary remedies that ‘may not be used to establish the existence of an enforceable right, but rather only to enforce a right already clearly and certainly established in the law.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rothenberg, Shepherd, Wells
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bush v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-12-21· cited 81×
- Estevez v. GordonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-07-22· cited 14×
- CAUCUS OF BLACK STATE LEGISLATORS v. CrosbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-14· cited 9×
- Sancho v. JoanosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-08-25· cited 9×
- Alexander v. City of Coral GablesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-09-13· cited 9×
- Henry v. SantanaSupreme Court of Florida· 2011-04-28· cited 7×
- Dante v. RyanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-04-09· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.